Screener
VFMV vs VTWO
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTWO costs 0.07% less per year.
- VTWO is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VTWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VTWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFMV | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $421M | $16.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +42.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 19.14% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -41.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFMV and VTWO
Explore further