Screener
VFVA vs FAB
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares vs First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.53% less per year.
- VFVA is significantly larger than FAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VFVA follows a active selection strategy; FAB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VFVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFVA | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $815M | $139M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.5% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -48.57% | -47.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFVA and FAB
Explore further