Screener
VFVA vs MFVL
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares vs Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.37% less per year.
- VFVA is significantly larger than MFVL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VFVA follows a active selection strategy; MFVL uses index tracking.
- VFVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VFVA | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $815M | $7M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.96% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | — |
| Max drawdown | -48.57% | -7.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VFVA and MFVL
Explore further