Screener
VICE vs RTH
AdvisorShares Vice ETF vs VanEck Retail ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.64% less per year.
- RTH is significantly larger than VICE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VICE follows a active selection strategy; RTH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VICE | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $265M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.9% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.7% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.14% | 11.88% |
| Max drawdown | -38.27% | -25.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VICE and RTH
Explore further