Screener
VNLA vs JLQD
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF vs Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- VNLA is significantly larger than JLQD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VNLA follows a active selection strategy; JLQD uses index tracking.
- VNLA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VNLA | JLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.2B | $25M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.25% | 5.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.24 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.65% | 3.97% |
| Max drawdown | -4.49% | -21.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VNLA and JLQD
Explore further