Screener
VO vs EPMV
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- VO costs 0.85% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VO | EPMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213.8B | $4M |
| Since | 2004 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.42% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -39.37% | -8.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VO and EPMV
Explore further