Screener
VO vs VFMV
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares vs Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares
Key differences
- VO costs 0.10% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VO | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213.8B | $421M |
| Since | 2004 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.42% | 8.86% |
| Max drawdown | -39.37% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VO and VFMV
Explore further