Screener
VONE vs FFLV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund ETF Shares vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- VONE costs 0.32% less per year.
- VONE is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VONE covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- VONE follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
- VONE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VONE | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.8B | $17M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -34.66% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VONE and FFLV
Explore further