Screener
VONG vs SMDV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- VONG costs 0.34% less per year.
- VONG is significantly larger than SMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VONG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VONG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VONG | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50.6B | $661M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 2.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.9% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.44% | 15.93% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VONG and SMDV
Explore further