Screener
VOO vs CATH
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
Key differences
- VOO costs 0.26% less per year.
- VOO is significantly larger than CATH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOO | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6T | $1.2B |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.4% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -33.99% | -33.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOO and CATH
Explore further