Screener
VPC vs BLV
Virtus Private Credit ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 10.57% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than VPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPC is classified as equity, while BLV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, VPC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPC | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 10.60% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 16.57% | 4.77% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.7% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | -2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | -0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.06% | 8.32% |
| Max drawdown | -53.45% | -38.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPC and BLV
Explore further