Screener
VPC vs CGHM
Virtus Private Credit ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
- CGHM costs 10.26% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than VPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPC is classified as equity, while CGHM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VPC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPC | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 10.60% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 16.57% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.7% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.06% | 3.15% |
| Max drawdown | -53.45% | -5.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPC and CGHM
Explore further