Screener
VRAI vs AGGA
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- AGGA is significantly larger than VRAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while AGGA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VRAI follows a index tracking strategy; AGGA uses active selection.
- VRAI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | AGGA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $76M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 2.16% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -1.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and AGGA
Explore further