Screener
VRAI vs CGBL
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.22% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than VRAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- VRAI follows a index tracking strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and CGBL
Explore further