Screener
VRAI vs GTO
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.20% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than VRAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while GTO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VRAI follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRAI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and GTO
Explore further