Screener
VRAI vs MUSI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 0.17% less per year.
- MUSI is significantly larger than VRAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while MUSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- VRAI follows a index tracking strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRAI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $214M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 3.36% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and MUSI
Explore further