Screener
VTWG vs IWF
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- VTWG costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than VTWG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VTWG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2010 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.5% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.49% | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -42.07% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VTWG and IWF
Explore further