Screener
WABF vs BYLD
Western Asset Bond ETF vs iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
Key differences
Both WABF and BYLD are fixed income ETFs. WABF charges 0.35% a year and BYLD 0.13%. The main difference: WABF follows a active selection strategy; BYLD uses index tracking.
- WABF follows a active selection strategy; BYLD uses index tracking.
- BYLD costs 0.22% less per year.
- BYLD is much larger than WABF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WABF | BYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $450M |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.80% | 5.34% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 3.83% |
| Max drawdown | -5.36% | -14.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.