Screener
WANT vs SZK
Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3XShrs vs ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
Key differences
- SZK costs 0.05% less per year.
- WANT is significantly larger than SZK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WANT follows a leveraged strategy; SZK uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, WANT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SZK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WANT | SZK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $5M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.4% | -6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.8% | -4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.9% | -5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | -0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 54.14% | 24.61% |
| Max drawdown | -85.89% | -86.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WANT and SZK
Explore further