Screener
WAR vs IWB
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.45% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than WAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WAR covers global markets; IWB covers north america.
- WAR follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WAR | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +75.9% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.02% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -19.13% | -34.60% |
Similar to WAR and IWB
Explore further