Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

WAR vs RSSL

U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF

WAR

U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF

U.S. Global Investors

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$27M

RSSL

Global X Russell 2000 ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.08%

Fund size

$1.4B

Key differences

  • RSSL costs 0.52% less per year.
  • RSSL is significantly larger than WAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • WAR covers global markets; RSSL covers north america.
  • WAR follows a active selection strategy; RSSL uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

WARRSSL
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.08%
Fund size (AUM)$27M$1.4B
Since20242024
Dividend yield0.14%1.33%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+70.5%+41.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y26.67%19.19%
Max drawdown-19.13%-27.79%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to WAR and RSSL