Screener
WARP vs SMH
VanEck Space ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.15% less per year.
- WARP covers global markets; SMH covers north america.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WARP | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $58.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +151.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +65.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +39.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.57% |
| Max drawdown | -3.24% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WARP and SMH
Explore further