Screener
WDIV vs CGDG
State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- WDIV costs 0.07% less per year.
- CGDG is significantly larger than WDIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WDIV covers north america markets; CGDG covers global.
- WDIV follows a index tracking strategy; CGDG uses active selection.
- WDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WDIV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.17% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -10.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WDIV and CGDG
Explore further