Screener
WDIV vs DIVZ
State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- WDIV costs 0.25% less per year.
- WDIV follows a index tracking strategy; DIVZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, WDIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- WDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WDIV | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $266M | $242M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.17% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WDIV and DIVZ
Explore further