Screener
WEBS vs METU
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
Key differences
- METU costs 0.05% less per year.
- METU is significantly larger than WEBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WEBS follows a inverse strategy; METU uses leveraged.
- WEBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WEBS | METU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $367M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.22% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -29.4% | -26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -52.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 56.97% | 69.39% |
| Max drawdown | -99.60% | -61.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WEBS and METU
Explore further