Screener
WEED vs BETZ
Roundhill Cannabis ETF vs Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Key differences
- WEED costs 0.34% less per year.
- BETZ is significantly larger than WEED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WEED follows a active selection strategy; BETZ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BETZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| WEED | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $51M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +85.3% | -7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 112.07% | 20.37% |
| Max drawdown | -88.07% | -60.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WEED and BETZ
Explore further