Screener
WTLS vs QIG
Wisdomtree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
Key differences
- QIG costs 0.70% less per year.
- WTLS is classified as alternative, while QIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- WTLS follows a long short strategy; QIG uses index tracking.
- QIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WTLS | QIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $18M |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.23% |
| Max drawdown | -8.95% | -22.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WTLS and QIG
Explore further