Screener
WTV vs DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Key differences
- WTV costs 0.16% less per year.
- DGRW is significantly larger than WTV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WTV follows a active selection strategy; DGRW uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, WTV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- WTV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WTV | DGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $16.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.94% | 10.02% |
| Max drawdown | -42.18% | -32.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WTV and DGRW
Explore further