Screener
WTV vs EMMF
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- WTV costs 0.36% less per year.
- WTV is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WTV covers north america markets; EMMF covers emerging markets.
- WTV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WTV | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $167M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.94% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -42.18% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WTV and EMMF
Explore further