Screener
WZRD vs AGOX
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- WZRD costs 0.33% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $364M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and AGOX
Explore further