Screener
WZRD vs CCOR
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both WZRD and CCOR are alternative ETFs. WZRD charges 1.00% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- WZRD costs 0.29% less per year.
- CCOR is much larger than WZRD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $27M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -79.00% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.