Screener
WZRD vs CWS
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS costs 0.35% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD is classified as alternative, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; CWS uses active selection.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $155M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and CWS
Explore further