Screener
WZRD vs INTL
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.16% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD covers north america markets; INTL covers global.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; INTL uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $222M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and INTL
Explore further