Screener
WZRD vs ISMF
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.20% less per year.
- ISMF is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD covers north america markets; ISMF covers global.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $57M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | structured outcome | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and ISMF
Explore further