Screener
WZRD vs LMBS
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
WZRD is an alternative ETF, while LMBS is a fixed income ETF. WZRD charges 1.00% a year and LMBS 0.66%.
- WZRD is an alternative fund, while LMBS is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
- LMBS costs 0.34% less per year.
- LMBS is much larger than WZRD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.94% |
| Max drawdown | -79.00% | -6.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.