Screener
WZRD vs TUG
Opportunistic Trader ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.35% less per year.
- TUG is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WZRD is classified as alternative, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- WZRD follows a structured outcome strategy; TUG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| WZRD | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $42M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -71.81% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to WZRD and TUG
Explore further