Screener
XAGG vs EVSD
Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF vs Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- EVSD costs 0.26% less per year.
- EVSD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XAGG | EVSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $963M | $1.2B |
| Since | 1997 | 1992 |
| Dividend yield | 6.36% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.55% |
| Max drawdown | -2.88% | -1.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XAGG and EVSD
Explore further