Screener
XBCI vs QQQH
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF vs NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- QQQH costs 0.30% less per year.
- QQQH is significantly larger than XBCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QQQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XBCI | QQQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $363M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -19.50% | -53.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XBCI and QQQH
Explore further