Screener
XC vs EMM
WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Fund vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XC costs 0.34% less per year.
- XC follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XC | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $58M |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | +60.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.69% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -20.97% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XC and EMM
Explore further