Screener
XCEM vs INEQ
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs Columbia International Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- XCEM costs 0.29% less per year.
- XCEM is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCEM covers emerging markets markets; INEQ covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $80M |
| Since | 2015 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and INEQ
Explore further