Screener
XCEM vs RESM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- XCEM covers emerging markets markets; RESM covers north america.
- XCEM follows a index tracking strategy; RESM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | — |
| Since | 2015 | — |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -8.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and RESM
Explore further