Screener
XCHG vs AFMC
Ab US Equity ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- XCHG costs 0.18% less per year.
- XCHG is significantly larger than AFMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $153M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and AFMC
Explore further