Screener
XCHG vs DCOR
Ab US Equity ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.36% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than XCHG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCHG is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and DCOR
Explore further