Screener
XCHG vs IUSV
Ab US Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
Key differences
- IUSV costs 0.46% less per year.
- IUSV is significantly larger than XCHG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCHG follows a active selection strategy; IUSV uses index tracking.
- IUSV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCHG | IUSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $25.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.14% |
| Max drawdown | -9.67% | -37.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCHG and IUSV
Explore further