Screener
XCNY vs EDIV
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.30% less per year.
- EDIV is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCNY is classified as equity, while EDIV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | EDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -40.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and EDIV
Explore further