Screener
XCNY vs EEMS
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.53% less per year.
- EEMS is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $452M |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -48.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and EEMS
Explore further