Screener
XCNY vs EMEM
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- XCNY follows a index tracking strategy; EMEM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | EMEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | — |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -0.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and EMEM
Explore further