Screener
XCNY vs FFEM
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.41% less per year.
- FFEM is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCNY | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $39M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.39% | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -19.70% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCNY and FFEM
Explore further