Screener
XDQQ vs ACSG
Innovator ETFs Trust vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.30% less per year.
- XDQQ is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XDQQ is classified as alternative, while ACSG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XDQQ follows a structured outcome strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| XDQQ | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $15M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.86% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.63% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XDQQ and ACSG
Explore further