Screener
XFLX vs SLNZ
FundX Flexible ETF vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
Both XFLX and SLNZ are fixed income ETFs. XFLX charges 0.97% a year and SLNZ 0.65%. The main difference: SLNZ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SLNZ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SLNZ is much larger than XFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XFLX | SLNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $226M |
| Since | 2002 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 9.67% | 7.50% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.62% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -6.54% | -2.57% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.